Measuring the Success of Counter-Trafficking Interventions in the Criminal Justice Sector: Who decides—and how? by Anne Gallagher and Rebecca Surtees
Global concern about human trafficking has prompted substantial investment in counter-trafficking interventions. That investment, and the human rights imperatives that underpin counter-trafficking work, demand that interventions demonstrate accountability, results and beneficial impact. How this can happen in practice is complicated and contested. This article, which considers success measurements with respect to criminal justice interventions, seeks to cut through the complexities presented by multiple theories and elaborate methodologies by focusing on one key issue: who decides success, and how? A review of evaluation reports and interviews with practitioners confirm that determinations of success (or failure) will vary according to: (i) who one consults and their role in the intervention; (ii) the criteria against which success is measured; and (iii) the assumptions that are built into that criteria. Each aspect is considered with reference to examples and insights drawn from recent practice. A major finding of the article is that the lack of an overarching vision of what “success” might look like allows mediocre or even harmful interventions to flourish and good work to go unrecognised and unrewarded.
Measuring the Success of Counter-Trafficking Interventions in the Criminal Justice Sector
- Human Rights and the New UN Protocols on Trafficking and Migrant Smuggling: A Preliminary Analysis by Anne Gallagher
- Human Rights and Human Trafficking: Quagmire or Firm Ground? A Response to James Hathaway by Anne Gallagher
- Developing an Effective Criminal Justice Response to Human Trafficking by Anne Gallagher and Paul Holmes
- A Shadow Report on Human Trafficking in Lao PDR: The US Approach vs. International Law by Anne Gallagher
- Trafficking and the Human Rights of Women by Janie Chuang and Anne Gallagher